Yeah, some replacement Chrysler sedans (the Pacifica is nice, but aging) are long over-due. The loyal, repeat buyers have been going to other brands as their 200s wear out.
When the 300 went RWD in 2005, we lost some FWD LH customers to Buick. The 300 was a left-over from the DaimlerChrysler days. The tooling was paid for & the related Charger/Challenger was still selling.
The 2nd generation 200 was fairly fresh when it got the ax. The Sterling Heights assembly (SHAP) capacity was needed for the Ram 1500. It was a business decision that still hurts.
Growing up in the '60's, my neighbor owned nothing but Newports. I loved those cars, but they were too big for today. I liked the Cirrus when it came out in 1995, especially with the V6. I had a Sebring convertible with the V6. The Cirrus/Sebring/200 was 'right-sized' for me. Good on gas, comfortable, strong acceleration & a nice highway cruiser.
The Airflow II would have been nice. It had that mid-size Chrysler family-resemblance. Corporate changed direction & wanted something like the Halcyon. I have mixed feelings about this car, but Chrysler must make a strong statement on the next model or wither & die.
The brand was going to go all-electric, but with the current state of the US govt it wouldn't ever be profitable or make much sense now.
There is nothing on the Stellantis new car lot that I would consider buying. The Hornet is nice, but way beyond my reach. I don't want a Ram or a Jeep, which was pretty-much all they had. Not much else. Still waiting for a sedan.